amolraj
05-23 04:08 PM
Hi,
Visa Interview: Que on Permission to enter New Delhi Embassy for 2 yr 3 months old Son
I am working in USA. I am planning to travel to India next month and require to apply for USA Visa interview.
I have 2 years and 3 months old younger Son who is born in USA and is a American Citizen holding American Passport.
Could you please shar exp. if he will be allowed to be with us during our Visa Interview in New Delhi Embassy. if Yes. pls let me know if there is any requirement for his entry inside the New Delhi Embassy.
Appreciate your reply in this regard.
thx
Amolraj
Visa Interview: Que on Permission to enter New Delhi Embassy for 2 yr 3 months old Son
I am working in USA. I am planning to travel to India next month and require to apply for USA Visa interview.
I have 2 years and 3 months old younger Son who is born in USA and is a American Citizen holding American Passport.
Could you please shar exp. if he will be allowed to be with us during our Visa Interview in New Delhi Embassy. if Yes. pls let me know if there is any requirement for his entry inside the New Delhi Embassy.
Appreciate your reply in this regard.
thx
Amolraj
wallpaper taylor swift straight hair
santb1975
01-28 10:45 PM
^^^
krishmunn
02-15 07:05 AM
For TC, if you are a AAA member, you can buy AMEX TC from AAA fee free.
Also, you get better exchange rates in India with TC.
Also, you get better exchange rates in India with TC.
2011 Taylor Swift on the straight
fromnaija
09-09 10:18 AM
If you are in the process of applying for H1 through another employer, you may be safe. As with everything USCIS, H1 revocation takes couple of months before it is approved. So in the interim you may get your new H1 approved before the previous employer's revocation sails through.
more...
immi_2006
08-11 04:44 PM
You need to send your wifes application where your 1-140 is pending or approved.
Blog Feeds
04-06 10:50 AM
Immigration Visa Attorney Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
The Barack Obama Administration recently announced that border guards at United States Ports of Entry (POE) will begin screening aliens arriving from certain countries based on specific information about threats to the USA. The immigration attorneys at Los Angeles' Fong & Chun immigration law firm are advocates for national security balanced against sensible protections for civil rights. We hope this change will reduce the number of unwarranted, unreasonable, and (usually) unfriendly challenges to certain arriving visitors.
Since the New York terrorist attack in September 2001, the USA has maintained a list of approximately fourteen countries (the so-called "group of fourteen") which are considered to encourage state-sponsored terrorism, or which are believed to provide assistance to terrorists. The US would not even officially name the specific countries, or confirm the exact number of countries, on the list. All citizens of one of these countries -- of any gender, any age, any social class, any educational level, for any reason -- would be subjected to additional interrogation by US Border Guards.
The newly-announced change sets up a system which uses intelligence information and threat assessment -- about specific persons, specific targets, and specific descriptions, to identify passengers who might have a link to terrorism. Quite properly, those persons would be subjected to additional scrutiny. Others who do not meet the more reasoned threat profiles would be allowed to enter the USA in the way of other visitors.
For example: most people in the know would say that the Islamic Republic of Iran was part of the group of fourteen. All citizens from Iran -- absolutely all -- would be pulled aside and interrogated at POEs. Under the new system, if the US has specific information about a 26-year old male Iranian student, or an Iranian woman with a certain name, or even someone with a partial passport number, then persons meeting those descriptions will be pulled aside. This allows border guards to focus their efforts on persons about whom the USA has specific threat-related information. --jcf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/04/border-guards-will-finally-use.html)
The Barack Obama Administration recently announced that border guards at United States Ports of Entry (POE) will begin screening aliens arriving from certain countries based on specific information about threats to the USA. The immigration attorneys at Los Angeles' Fong & Chun immigration law firm are advocates for national security balanced against sensible protections for civil rights. We hope this change will reduce the number of unwarranted, unreasonable, and (usually) unfriendly challenges to certain arriving visitors.
Since the New York terrorist attack in September 2001, the USA has maintained a list of approximately fourteen countries (the so-called "group of fourteen") which are considered to encourage state-sponsored terrorism, or which are believed to provide assistance to terrorists. The US would not even officially name the specific countries, or confirm the exact number of countries, on the list. All citizens of one of these countries -- of any gender, any age, any social class, any educational level, for any reason -- would be subjected to additional interrogation by US Border Guards.
The newly-announced change sets up a system which uses intelligence information and threat assessment -- about specific persons, specific targets, and specific descriptions, to identify passengers who might have a link to terrorism. Quite properly, those persons would be subjected to additional scrutiny. Others who do not meet the more reasoned threat profiles would be allowed to enter the USA in the way of other visitors.
For example: most people in the know would say that the Islamic Republic of Iran was part of the group of fourteen. All citizens from Iran -- absolutely all -- would be pulled aside and interrogated at POEs. Under the new system, if the US has specific information about a 26-year old male Iranian student, or an Iranian woman with a certain name, or even someone with a partial passport number, then persons meeting those descriptions will be pulled aside. This allows border guards to focus their efforts on persons about whom the USA has specific threat-related information. --jcf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/04/border-guards-will-finally-use.html)
more...
chanduv23
10-25 03:58 PM
Dear IVans,
Attorney Prashanti Reddy will be addressing the proud Immigration Voice members at the New Jersey event being held at Woodbridge, NJ on Sunday, October 28th, 2007.
She is a active member at AILA and is involved in a lotof pro bono work and works for a lot of non profit organizations like "Trial Lawyers Care" and "Maanavi"
She also conducts free chat sessions at the popular "telugu" language portal www.telugupeople.com
Please find her Chat Transcripts at
http://chat.telugupeople.com/chatshows/
Her website is http://www.reddyesq.com and she is a proud supporter of Immigration Voice.
She is willing to answer our questions and as part of Immigration Voice Protocol, we will be moderating the questions.
If you have not yet signed up for the event do so, right now. Follow the link
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=14671
Please post your questions on this thread, if you are attending the event.
Yours,
Team IV
Attorney Prashanti Reddy will be addressing the proud Immigration Voice members at the New Jersey event being held at Woodbridge, NJ on Sunday, October 28th, 2007.
She is a active member at AILA and is involved in a lotof pro bono work and works for a lot of non profit organizations like "Trial Lawyers Care" and "Maanavi"
She also conducts free chat sessions at the popular "telugu" language portal www.telugupeople.com
Please find her Chat Transcripts at
http://chat.telugupeople.com/chatshows/
Her website is http://www.reddyesq.com and she is a proud supporter of Immigration Voice.
She is willing to answer our questions and as part of Immigration Voice Protocol, we will be moderating the questions.
If you have not yet signed up for the event do so, right now. Follow the link
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=14671
Please post your questions on this thread, if you are attending the event.
Yours,
Team IV
2010 Swift launched her second
REQUIRE_GC
11-15 06:00 PM
Congrats!!!!!!!!!!. You filed in Aug and received AP.
I filed in July (Please see signature) but Ap not reveived.
Friend of mine file in Aug and received the AP. Did your case status on website got updated?
Thanks
I filed in July (Please see signature) but Ap not reveived.
Friend of mine file in Aug and received the AP. Did your case status on website got updated?
Thanks
more...
kirupa
04-08 02:19 AM
it's ok - I already changed the stamp template for all of the entries that have been submitted: http://www.kirupa.com/lab/kirupaStamps.htm It wouldn't be fair for me to give you guys more work because of a slight oversight on my part ;)
hair Taylor+swift+straight+hair
sendmailtojk
11-11 09:49 PM
My son was > 21 years of age when my I-140 was applied (Aug 07). So I guess I can forget it.
more...
BumbleBee
08-15 01:41 PM
Yes lonemetro,
You can re-use priority date established on first I-140 for any sub-sequent I-140 filling. As I understand from your post, you have EB3 labor approved and have just filed for I-140 based on it.
Now, parent company wants to transfer you. Generally I would think you should be able to transfer and still have your GC process going if the company indeed is a 'parent company' but seems there is something different here.
As a general rule, as long as your previously approved I-140 remained approved, you can re-use priority date established for that I-140 for any subsequent I-140 petition. The sub-sequent petition can be with any employer, and yes, you would need a new labor to file that new I-140 :)
Try EB1 or EB2 this time :cool:
BumbleBee
You can re-use priority date established on first I-140 for any sub-sequent I-140 filling. As I understand from your post, you have EB3 labor approved and have just filed for I-140 based on it.
Now, parent company wants to transfer you. Generally I would think you should be able to transfer and still have your GC process going if the company indeed is a 'parent company' but seems there is something different here.
As a general rule, as long as your previously approved I-140 remained approved, you can re-use priority date established for that I-140 for any subsequent I-140 petition. The sub-sequent petition can be with any employer, and yes, you would need a new labor to file that new I-140 :)
Try EB1 or EB2 this time :cool:
BumbleBee
hot Taylor Swift Didn#39;t Learn A
rp0lol
07-24 04:24 PM
It is illegal to overstay on a visitors visa, for that matter it is illegal to stay on any expired visa.
I don't think it is illegal to stay beyond your I-94 expiration date, if you already file for an extention or change of status.
Generally lawyers advise not to travel, when h1 or h4 application is pending. as your H-4 approval will come with another (new) I-94 attached to it.
So best thing check with your spouse's lawyer.
I don't think it is illegal to stay beyond your I-94 expiration date, if you already file for an extention or change of status.
Generally lawyers advise not to travel, when h1 or h4 application is pending. as your H-4 approval will come with another (new) I-94 attached to it.
So best thing check with your spouse's lawyer.
more...
house taylor swift style hair.
[uber]
04-09 03:52 AM
yea i though so too... but i wanted to convey the parody in the stamp itself... this is why ya3 does the mac art :P
I don't care if it gets added or not... ya3... i give you the torch... yo make a better one to get put up... i'll go make a FF stamp... THAT i know how do do....
I don't care if it gets added or not... ya3... i give you the torch... yo make a better one to get put up... i'll go make a FF stamp... THAT i know how do do....
tattoo taylor swift brother austin.
kirupa
04-13 12:00 AM
The reason this doesn't work is because WebClient works asynchronously. Your for loop runs to completion, spawning the appropriate WebClient instances independently without making sure the WebClient instance it spawned gets the data.
My quick advice would be to use something recursive where the function gets called only when a WebClient's completed event fires. You can use a counter that increments before the function gets called to simulate the index value as well.
Cheers,
Kirupa :nat:
My quick advice would be to use something recursive where the function gets called only when a WebClient's completed event fires. You can use a counter that increments before the function gets called to simulate the index value as well.
Cheers,
Kirupa :nat:
more...
pictures Taylor+swift+hair+straight
gc_chahiye
06-08 04:45 PM
LC is Certified this week.
congrats. was it EB2 or EB3?
All the best with I-140 (and hopefully a concurrent I-485 depending on how dates move in July :) )
congrats. was it EB2 or EB3?
All the best with I-140 (and hopefully a concurrent I-485 depending on how dates move in July :) )
dresses jun hq re Taylor+swift+cmt
ramus
09-08 05:19 PM
GA members, please join this group asap..
Lets be all together and help ourself.
Hello Georgia members. Thanks for everyone who is joining the rally. I've created a googlegroup for the GA member. Please join this group.
http://groups.google.com/group/goivgaiv
Lets be all together and help ourself.
Hello Georgia members. Thanks for everyone who is joining the rally. I've created a googlegroup for the GA member. Please join this group.
http://groups.google.com/group/goivgaiv
more...
makeup Taylor swift is one of the
Bharat123
07-26 07:38 PM
My spouse was on H4 then got a job and changed to H1. Subsequently spouse lost her job and is now back on H4. I have been on H1 throughout and my six years of H1B visa expire in 2010. MY spouse I and want to get our H1 and H4 visa stamped in Mumbai consulate.
Does any one think that the changeover from H4 to H1 and then again to H4 could be a reason to be concerned about for getting the visa stamped at the consulate?
Appreciate your valauable advice.
Does any one think that the changeover from H4 to H1 and then again to H4 could be a reason to be concerned about for getting the visa stamped at the consulate?
Appreciate your valauable advice.
girlfriend taylor swift new haircut 2011.
karthik204
02-22 07:13 PM
This is going to be interesting.. Finally someone speeking about legal immigration..
hairstyles Taylor swift with straight
guyfromsg
07-26 08:31 PM
hey guys,
i send in my i-140/i485 along with those for my wife. as luck will have it, I forgot to include her sealed i-693. i am planning to send it tomorrow with a cover letter. is that okay? is there anything else I can do?
I will appreciate any help.
thanks
ashish
According to USCIS FAQ 14, 485 can be filed without medical examination report. You will get a RFE instead of rejection
http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/EBFAQ1.pdf
i send in my i-140/i485 along with those for my wife. as luck will have it, I forgot to include her sealed i-693. i am planning to send it tomorrow with a cover letter. is that okay? is there anything else I can do?
I will appreciate any help.
thanks
ashish
According to USCIS FAQ 14, 485 can be filed without medical examination report. You will get a RFE instead of rejection
http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/EBFAQ1.pdf
yabadaba
10-19 09:04 AM
its applicable to everybody...if ur victim of a crime...u can get gc too.
franklin
06-26 02:56 AM
I think it is apparent that people on this forum are frustrated with media representation and lack of understanding of the problems that our group, and those that we represent, face.
Without wishing to get into general political debates, it is probably a fair assumption that American citizens who are actively part of grassroots activism would be concerned about our situation if they knew about it.
There is a voice in numbers, and I believe it might be a good idea to reach out to organizations such as www.indymedia.com (http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml). This is a main hub, there are various regional versions of the organization.
Just another thought on how to publicize our issues.
Without wishing to get into general political debates, it is probably a fair assumption that American citizens who are actively part of grassroots activism would be concerned about our situation if they knew about it.
There is a voice in numbers, and I believe it might be a good idea to reach out to organizations such as www.indymedia.com (http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml). This is a main hub, there are various regional versions of the organization.
Just another thought on how to publicize our issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment